JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 27, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Miguel Alfredo Tamara Paternina Vs. Instituto Nacional De La Reforma Agraria -Incora En Liquidacion- Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Segundo Laboral Del Circuito De Sincelejo Y El Tribunal Administrativo De Sucre. Ordena Remitir El Expediente Contentivo De La Accion De Tutela Al Juzgado Segundo Laboral Del Circuito De Sincelejo, Para Que De Forma Inmediata Le De Tramite.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Incora En Liquidacion Y Fondo De Pasivo Social De Ferrocarriles Nacionales
  • Entidades descentralizadas por servicios del orden nacional
Juez
  • No le es dado declararse incompetente para conocer acción de tutela que le corresponde de acuerdo a las reglas que rigen el trámite administrativo de reparto
5 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ORDENAR al Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Laboral del Circuito de Sincelejo, que de forma inmediata, le imprima el tramite a la solicitud de proteccion constitucional impetrada por el senor Miguel Alfredo Tamara Paternina, conforme a las previsiones del articulo 86 de la Constitucion Politica y del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, comuniquese al Tribunal Administrativo de Sucre, la decision adoptada para los fines expuestos en esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.